If you’re intrigued by Biblical “undesigned coincidences” in, especially, the Gospels and Acts, you might want to check out some videos. You can go to YouTube and search for undesigned/coincidences/mcgrew, and you can also look specifically at the series there, “Beginner’s Guide to Undesigned Coincidences” (23 of them). See if you agree that these coincidences are especially well-suited to video treatment.
And if you’re a fan of William Lane Craig (as you should be, IMHO), you can check out these videos here. It’s interesting that, in the first one on the historicity of the Resurrection — “Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?”; see also this follow-up video here) — what I think of as the Habermas/Licona (“minimal facts”) approach is taken. That is, rather than arguing for the general reliability of the Gospels and Acts as a whole (as contemporaneous eyewitness accounts, etc.), it is instead argued that a relatively few but critically important historical facts are well-established and widely accepted by historians — and those facts are themselves enough to make a solid case for Jesus’ divinity. Here again, I think video treatment works quite well.
Finally, I’m adding this link to Pascal biographer Graham Tomlin discussing the wager: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTjxkYExgQc