Entries that relate to Pascal’s wager.
Just FYI and FWIW: I typed in “fine-tuning god arguments summary” into my Chrome search engine, and here’s what its AI says: AI Overview The “fine-tuning argument” for the existence of God claims that the universe’s physical constants and initial conditions are so precisely balanced to allow for life that it indicates a deliberate design, implying … [Read more…]
I was googling “best gospel books” or something like that and, lo and behold, I found the subject of this blog post, namely Leo Tolstoy’s The Gospel in Brief. My thought then was, well, Tolstoy was one of the great writers of all time, and a committed Christian, and so it would make a lot … [Read more…]
Here are the last two paragraphs from an article by Alexander Riley in the latest (November/December 2024) issue of Touchstone magazine (page 17): Nietzsche admired Pascal greatly, though he also criticized him, and considered him perhaps the most tragic victim of Christianity. Like Nietzsche, Pascal gazed at the infinity of indifferent time and space. Unlike … [Read more…]
Is There a God? I have some good news for you, gentle reader: I can recommend to you a wonderful apologetics book by a distinguished Oxford philosophy professor, it’s only 123 pages long, and you can read it right now for free since the whole book is online here [link: https://ia801904.us.archive.org/13/items/RichardSwinburne/RichardSwinburne-IsThereAGod.pdf ]. I was led … [Read more…]
Maybe it’s the lawyer in me, but I find that sometimes it’s useful to pretend you have to make arguments supporting the opposing side. So, how would you imagine an intelligent rejection of Pascal’s Wager? This imaginary person would, it seems to me, have to say this sentence to himself: Okay, I understand that it … [Read more…]
There’s an interview of Stephen C. Meyer by Terrell Clemmons (“Faithful Knowledge,” 42, 45) in the September/October 2024 issue of Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity, in which the former says (emphasis in original): …. Someone once said that the work of the Holy Spirit is to make subjectively real to the individual believer things that … [Read more…]
There’s a new book out, A Summer with Pascal, by Antoine Compagnon. I have not read it, but I did read a review of it in the Wall Street Journal last week (July 27-28, 2024, at page C12), and it looks interesting. I feel I should note the book’s publication on this blogsite — after … [Read more…]
I recently posted this on National Review Online‘s “The Corner”: I very much enjoyed Kayla Bartsch’s Corner post on Friday (“Sociology Comes for Sundays”) and would like to add a bit to it. It is certainly true that “religious practice” can have a variety of secular benefits, even if one lacks solid faith, and that noting … [Read more…]
Joseph Epstein is what used to be called, and I guess still is, a “man of letters.” That is, he is a writer of his own books, essays, and shorter pieces, on a wide variety of nonscientific subjects, as well as a literary critic. If you’ve run across him lately, it’s probably through short columns … [Read more…]
This is a very engaging book, with an exciting premise: It imagines what it would be like if St. Paul and the prophet Muhammad were to have a formal debate on whether or not Jesus was resurrected (!). The idea is that MIT has been able to create two opposing lifelike holograms that, by computers … [Read more…]